Here is what one activist, Susan Elofson-Hurst, said afterward: "I was at the Sharing session at the Arvada Center last night; the only ones allowed to share were the speakers. It seemed obvious that the U.S. Fish & Wildlife staff is afraid of what the public has to say. This is a tactic that CDPHE adopted many years ago so the could sidestep any criticism. The response from the public was overwhelmingly NOT in favor of the Wildlife Refuge being opened to the public. These are the question I had for the speakers last night: • It appeared that “dose” to individuals was based on exposure to plutonium (Pu). Since the Aerial Gamma Survey from 20 years ago showed an Americium (Am) field approaching Indiana Street, are any Am exposures being taken into account?   The PR flack running the meeting would not let the public speak to the meeting or ask questions in public. Ann Fenerty, with a masters in chemistry, tried to use the microphone to talk about the plant being superfund site. The PR flack took the mike out of Ann's hands and would not let her speak. So some of us did the "Occupy mike check" version of a loudspeaker where we loudly repeated what Ann said. We were told to go into corners and talk amongst ourselves. There were many good activists there though, and they did talk. Leroy Moore wrote that they sampled nothing below six feet. Building walls were collapsed into their basements and the remains covered with soil. The cleanup was driven by a decision between DOE, Kaiser-Hill and Congress that set a limit of $7 billion and 10 years. It gave bonuses for a quick partial clean-up. Ann had brought a large DOE map showing that Rocky Flats was a superfund site full of contaminated buildings and spray fields. It showed deep underground tunnels for trucks and 4 story underground buildings that were collapsed onto themselves and buried. So that the underground tunnels, pipelines of plutonium, and the contaminated floor slabs were left and buried there.